Collective
Intelligence: What it could mean for education Summary:
In Bullock’s Article, he describes
why the digital natives and digital immigrants shouldn’t be separated, but be
working together through collective intelligence. Bullock says that technology (Web 2.0) can be
used to reform the education system in North America in “powerful ways.” The education system in NA is geared for the
individual and is restrictive to collaboration and group efforts. However, by adopting collective intelligence,
NA can promote collaboration, cooperation, and sharing of information through
the use of social media, wikis, and documents.
Bullock says “Teacher
educators have a golden opportunity to disrupt the effects of mass
acculturation through traditional schooling by using digital technologies that
are likely to contribute to collective intelligence.”
How Collective
Intelligence Redefines Education Summary:
In this article, Ilon first explains
how the school system is “governed” from the top down. He shows how the student is set up to learn “facts”
from the so-called “experts” in each field.
This way, the student can be accurately tested and the
growth/understanding can be measured. He
points out that a school is setup similar to a factory, where all working parts
are trying to create the same end product.
He states in today’s current system there is no place for collective
intelligence. Ilon also points out the
fact that many schools have sites such as Wikipedia.com blocked from use. One of the biggest factors to overcome, in
implementing collective intelligence, is the structure of the current
system. The article states, “If formal
educational systems are to embrace collective intelligence, they will require a
systemic revamp.” Ilon then goes on to
illustrate how effective collective intelligence can be in the education system
with examples of use in the real world.
By relating the collective intelligence system to our current economic
system, Ilon claims that collective intelligence is valid and we can use our
economic system as the framework.
7 Things You Should Know
About Personal Learning Environments Summary:
A personal learning environment
or PLE “describes the tools, communities, and services that constitute the
individual educational platforms learners use to direct their own learning and pursue
educational goals.” These differ from LMS’s
(learning management system) which are more course-centric. The article summarizes the growing use of
PLEs in colleges and universities and where the future of PLEs could take
education. The effects PLEs could have
on the classroom are endless, but the article focuses on the collaboration and
orchestration of collecting information, rather than memorizing facts. The drawbacks, as shown in the article, would
include students referencing resources that are “taken down” or no longer
available through technology and students misinterpreting opinion for fact.
PLE Video Summary:
The student begins by showing us
how her PLE is set up. She is working
through Google docs and has her background separated by academics and personal
files. She starts by showing us some of
the features of her Google docs and then jumps into her agenda for science
class. We see she is doing a report on
animals, more specifically the box jellyfish.
She shows us where she got her information and how she created a
glogster (page of information) to display the research she found. She shows us numerous ways in which she is
peer reviewed and even contacts a couple “experts” on box jellyfish to check
her work. At the end of the video, the
student comments on how much better it is to research in this fashion rather
than using a textbook or notebook and paper.
Reflection:
After reading the first two articles on collective
intelligence, I can see the benefits and why people are pushing to implement
this system into education. It is a
great way to instill collaboration and cooperation between peers, students-teachers-parents,
and worldwide classrooms. People
sharing, adding, collection, and organizing information to work toward the same
goal can only lead to good things. As
Ilon’s article states, the current system we have implemented will need to be
reformed before we can incorporate collective intelligence. I find myself trying to implement these types
of projects/methods of learning, but I find I don’t have time and I know other
teachers out there who feel the same. I
don’t mean time in a day or time to plan, but with the “almighty” test approaching,
there is no time to steer off course from that material.
We just had a county wide meeting where our curriculum
director talked to us about teaching to the test because in the future we might
move to merit pay… She said people
always ask why she wants us to teach to the test, and her response was “is
there anything on the test you don’t think the students should know?” Well, this is where the problem lies. While everything on the test may be
important, who is to say that Johnny or Susie doesn’t know the material because
they didn’t answer one question about it correctly at that one time. This is where collective intelligence could
benefit students because they will have access to the information and can
utilize available resources rather than memorizing facts.
The article and video on PLEs was very
interesting. I enjoyed seeing a PLE in
action, and would like to utilize that in my own classroom. The PLEs allow students to work through at
their own pace with more internal goals driving their learning. One flaw I see in my own classroom, however,
is the fact that students have no technology skills to begin with. At my school district, we do not have any
technology classes until high school, so setting up something like a PLE will
take months, starting with the basics of technology. Granted, there will be students, who know how
to do/pick up on things easily, but overall, it will take time (and again time
is something I don’t have to give).
I would like to see a reform of the current
system. The push with differentiation is
a step in the right direction, but even so, we are differentiating the students
to learn the same thing for the same test.
Hopefully in the future we will see collective intelligence utilized and
PLEs set up in the classroom, but with the current structure of our education
system I don’t think it will happen.
Travis, I can see that you are frustrated with state mandated testing. It's difficult to try innovative teaching methods when the test is the priority. I'm also bummed to hear how your county-wide meeting went. My best advice is to do what you think is best for students. You will need to teach them the basic skills for the test, but try to balance that with the types of methods and topics that excite you. It will only benefit you and your students... and who knows, maybe you'll influence "the system" along the way. :)
ReplyDelete